Recent content by Nick M

Les Feldick had a good saying. People take the NT and throw it a blender and hit go. I was talking pre-trib with someone who says he agrees on X. And he included Matthew and John somehow. I have seen the Matthew 24 before, with clowns like Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggart. He is describing...

Glock discontinued their models from pressure dues to the fact that a Glock can be converted. The 18 is built with select fire by Glock.

All rapists should be executed. And false accusers of the same. But this is a good start, it is getting rid of the groomers and will drive homos out of the state.

No, symbolism. Water baptism is symbolic too, for the Israelites. Their sin wasn't actually washed away.

I positioned myself and questions to get to the root, and it contradicted itself from telling me it wasn't used anywhere else in the NT. I have a tangent, and in my opinion, it is a good one.

Go read the "King James Only" Battle Royal here. Specifically, look at the notes from those that say it isn't KJB.

Because I do not read any of it. All of my conclusions are from translators, old and new. As well as context, scripture against scripture...etc.

The Lord Jesus Christ quoted it. Therefore, I know it is good. And remember, it is a translation.

A little Bob Hill Greek lessons. Acts 19 9 But when some were hardened and did not believe, but spoke evil of the Way before the multitude, he departed from them and withdrew the disciples, reasoning daily in the school of Tyrannus. Strongs calls it Chat GPT told me "departing" wasn't used...

I do it all the time.

Me too

I have been told we don't remember them. On youtube of course. And the signs that you do dream and are in "REM" sleep.

Going to family on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day in my childhood.

I am guessing Paul's letters are not included. And I have read it was about several centuries old at the time of Christ. I wold say no.