Lon's latest activity

Catholics would have to concern themselves with being biblical if anything you said here had any effect on their doctrine. They don't...

Pride.

See here the difference between Dyophysitism and Miaphysitism

It'd seem Clete and I are concerned with Mariology problems in the RC (rosary beads by example). I have several, refused to do "Hail...

I'll state my idea of freewill: We are either 'free' from God (the Fall) or 'freed' by a new nature, to follow Him and eschew sin...

Adam and Eve, certainly tempted. I'd imagine the angels Satan took with him, were tempted by him. It leaves in question: How was...

This one handles my response: "Further, the theory states that sin nature is not necessary for sin to occur. Neither Adam and Eve nor...

Thank you for suffering through it for us!

I'm just embarrassed for her every time I hear her.

Because it's the exact same person, Doug!

Yes He was. The LOGOS became flesh. That's literally what "incarnation" means! HE BECAME A MAN! Because it's false! Jesus IS the...

No issues with any of that, but you were suggesting that one can have a sin nature and still not sin, as you said here: Are you saying...

At least in likeness, for Jesus to be 'tempted as we are." Good, hard question. More below: Read this theological treatise. Then...

Meaning that Christ had a sin nature at birth? Or do you mean that Adam was created with a sin nature? Answering yes to either of these...