Recent content by JudgeRightly

Something to help illustrate my point:

The age of the discussion does not mean that the defeaters have been answered. If the specific objections I summarized above have been answered, then please refresh my memory, or point to where they were answered. Otherwise, I’ll refer you back to the summary rather than repeat all of it here...

Since you keep saying this is all repetition, let me summarize the actual defeaters of your position and the questions your position still has not answered, so that if you make an argument that falls under one of these defeaters, I can simply refer you back here. 1. You have not shown that...

Not honestly. If you refuse to read the answers, then you do not get to claim the answers were not given or are insufficient. That is about the same time you stopped answering my arguments at all. And this is circular. You say you will not read the replies because nothing new is being said...

No, that's what's in dispute. The Constitution does not say, “the soil under the hospital bed overrides the political status of the family.” The Constitution says a person must be born in the United States AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof. You are assuming that second requirement is...

I thought it was really good. But I've always been a fan of scifi stuff. Haven't read the book yet, so can't compare it. But I can definitely recommend it as a movie. https://criticless.com/titles/project-hail-mary

Sure. And I appreciate the question being asked that way. Fair warning, this will probably be quite long. The primary premise of Open Theism is that God is free. Every theological system starts with that premise at the beginning. Whether God remains free in their system is a different matter...

Mostly agreed, with one important clarification. Subjects do not have supreme civil authority over the king. They do not have jurisdiction to command him, prosecute him, judge him (in the judicial sense), or remove him. What they do have is moral responsibility before God, which means they...

Then you cannot complain that your points have not been answered. Those “seven sentences” contained multiple claims, accusations, and misrepresentations of my position. I answered them individually because that is what actually moves a discussion forward. If you will not read the answers, that...

"Perfect knowledge of man" (as the NKJV titles the chapter) does not equate to "complete knowledge of everything and of past present and future." God made man. He knows how man functions. He knows the hearts of men, because he can look at their hearts and know their thoughts. And groups of...

Assimilation IS measured. Maybe not with a ruler or a clipboard in every case, but it is measured. It is measured by whether someone understands and can speak the national language. It is measured by whether he adapts to the culture. It is measured by whether he integrates into the surrounding...

I almost missed this. I already tried granting that for the sake of argument earlier. Suppose your removal system could exist. Suppose the constitution could establish it. Suppose the procedure could be written down. The same structural questions still remain: Who operates it? Who judges...

You're talking to someone who runs on "feelings."