JudgeRightly's latest activity

I screwed up when editing the OP and had two paragraphs in there that said almost verbatim the same thing. I've reworded it to reduce...

Yeah, but I like keeping things short and to the point where possible.

"Cop out", is too kind. He is intentionally, knowingly and blatantly dishonest... WITH HIMSELF!!!! A completely total waste of time...

Teeth-gnasher, why can you never refrain from your impulse to react angrily like that? I mean, I understand what it is that angers you...

What are you even talking about?

All of this applies to us as well. We listen to experts, who likely know more than we do. There is evidence to back up our claims. We...

That is, you're taking a lot of what you choose to refer to as "science" on faith. Obviously you wish to put it that way, since you did...

Let's cut to the chase. I listen to experts, they likely know more about their subject than I do. There is evidence to back up...

5000 years ago? 50,000 years ago? 500,000 years ago? 5,000,000 years ago? Do you see that you have a firmed exactly what I said? That...

Laws of Logic: Law of Non-Contradiction. "For any given proposition, the proposition and its negation cannot both be simultaneously...

Okay. And he has access to both accounts. I will just merge them and tell him socks are not allowed.

The science shows that it would have to defy the laws of physics. And yet you cannot point to one? I'm not confused, but you are.

His account is different.

Was that supposed to be a full response to my request?