ECT THE PRACTICAL NECESSITY OF AN INFALLIBLE & AUTHORITATIVE INTERPRETER
- Thread starter Cruciform
- Start date
The Holy Spirit who is the Author is both infallible and authoritativeand the only Interpreter whose divine office the pope has usurped.
Cruciform
New member
And through whom or what does the infallible interpretation of the Holy Spirit come to the faithful---by what authoritative human agent or agency?
HisServant
New member
Comments or Questions?
And yet we know that Peter was fallible and Paul was not above injecting his opinions into scripture...
The Holy Spirit is the only infallible teacher.. not the scripture interpreted by some pedophiles and homosexuals in Rome.... the city hated and under a perpetual curse by God.
Seriously, God is a liar if he based is church out of Rome.. since he has shown that he cannot keep his own promises.
Also, you would be more accurate if you replaced 'practical necessity' with 'carnal desire'.. its way more accurate.
Last edited:
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
If the OP is correct, we should study the cathecism instead of our Bibles.
Hardly what we are told by scripture itself...
Hardly what we are told by scripture itself...
Peter said scripture is not open to private interpretation....what don't you understand in scripture? Jesus said the Holy Spirit dwells in the believer...
The reason there are so many interpretations [even within the RCC] is because as Peter says people twist it to make it fit their own doctrines.
genuineoriginal
New member
That is not what Peter said.
Actually, both origin and interpretation rely on one another.
That is EACTLY what he said
Knowing this first that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation
For the prophecy came not of old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost
Scripture comes the same way but is written, when Paul wrote to Corinth he wrote under that same inspiration.
There was no Pope in Rome in those days
genuineoriginal
New member
Some of us can see a difference between "scripture is not open to private interpretation" and "no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation".
I say the writings of Paul came the same way as prophecy came to holy men of old...they spake...Paul wrate
genuineoriginal
New member
Not all of what Paul wrote meets that criteria.
1 Corinthians 7:25 25 Now concerning virgins I have no commandment of the Lord: yet I give my judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful. |
Note then how careful Paul is to note those 2 instances when it is he and not the Lord speaking.
...this proves that all other times it is to be taken as though spoken of the Lord.
...this proves that all other times it is to be taken as though spoken of the Lord.
whitestone
Well-known member
So in Luke 1:2 KJV are the things Luke is writing something he received as he was moved by the Holy spirit, or what he was taught/told by those who were eyewitnesses?
Both the testimonies and the selection of them were by the Holy Ghost
you also know that peter went to babylon
HisServant
New member
Yup.. he went to Persia to minister to the Jews hiding out there. And probably died there too.
I rest my case