Eric Clapton shunned for speaking of his bad side effects from the covid vaccine

marke

Well-known member
If you do not want to lose respect, your job, or future opportunities then you had better not say anything that runs contrary to approved leftist dogma and narratives. Eric Clapton is finding out that speaking the truth is not well received by ignorant people blindly promoting the lying leftist narratives. Covid vaccines do exhibit dangerous side effects in spite of what the leftist liberals want people believing.

Legendary guitarist Eric Clapton said his musician friends stopped communicating with him after he recently spoke out about his "disastrous" COVID-19 side effects.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Eric Clapton is shunned for a lot of reasons. In the case of the vaccine, he claims that he couldn't use his hands for several weeks after getting the second shot. In fact, Clapton has spoken for years now about his deteriorating physical condition and how it is affecting his ability to play the guitar.

He also went off on racist rants, which he has since regretted, back in the '70s when he was addicted to cocaine, heroin and alcohol. Remember the "Rock Against Racism" campaign back in the mid-1980s? That movement was inspired directly as a reaction against Clapton's racism.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Eric Clapton is shunned for a lot of reasons. In the case of the vaccine, he claims that he couldn't use his hands for several weeks after getting the second shot. In fact, Clapton has spoken for years now about his deteriorating physical condition and how it is affecting his ability to play the guitar.

He also went off on racist rants, which he has since regretted, back in the '70s when he was addicted to cocaine, heroin and alcohol. Remember the "Rock Against Racism" campaign back in the mid-1980s? That movement was inspired directly as a reaction against Clapton's racism.
You just proved how little you think.

That someone has a degenerative condition that has affected them for years, and they have still continued to function means their ability does not go away in one fell swoop. Clapton's did. His condition affected both his hands and his feet. He couldn't walk either.

Your deceitful argument just exposes your agenda. What does Clapton's views on race have to do with what happened to his hands and feet? Absolutely nothing. Just more fallacious arguments on your part.

The worst part of all of this is there has been sound medical information posted here that if you would bother to learn from would tell you that you're dead wrong in your assumptions of the safety of the so-called vaccines. But I know you won't bother learning from scientists themselves, including the inventor of mrna vaccines and a highly skilled DoD scientist. So, just keep on ignoring all the knowledge that is becoming available and just keep on with your ignorant agenda.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
That someone has a degenerative condition that has affected them for years, and they have still continued to function means their ability does not go away in one fell swoop. Clapton's did.
Years worth of cocaine and heroin abuse? No problem! But one vaccine and he's done for!
 

marke

Well-known member
Eric Clapton is shunned for a lot of reasons. In the case of the vaccine, he claims that he couldn't use his hands for several weeks after getting the second shot. In fact, Clapton has spoken for years now about his deteriorating physical condition and how it is affecting his ability to play the guitar.

He also went off on racist rants, which he has since regretted, back in the '70s when he was addicted to cocaine, heroin and alcohol. Remember the "Rock Against Racism" campaign back in the mid-1980s? That movement was inspired directly as a reaction against Clapton's racism.
So, what do you think? Did the vaccine make Eric Clapton sick or not? And did the vaccine kill Hank Aaron or not?
 

marke

Well-known member
You just proved how little you think. Your deceitful argument just exposes your agenda. I'm not in favor of "cancelling" Eric Clapton at all.
Every American should support further testing on vaccines which are making so many people sick, some seriously.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
So, what do you think? Did the vaccine make Eric Clapton sick or not? And did the vaccine kill Hank Aaron or not?
Even if the vaccine did make Clapton sick and kill Hank Aaron (which I doubt), it is still worth taking the chance. If you think the vaccine is bad, imagine how much worse the actual disease is.

The rule of thumb here is "The greatest good for the greatest number of people." Immunity to the coronavirus is the greatest good. It will prevent the most illnesses and deaths. The few injuries/deaths it may cause would be unfortunate if they happen, but the illnesses/deaths that would occur without the vaccine are much greater, therefore we must go with using the vaccine instead of going without it.
 

marke

Well-known member
Even if the vaccine did make Clapton sick and kill Hank Aaron (which I doubt), it is still worth taking the chance. If you think the vaccine is bad, imagine how much worse the actual disease is.

The rule of thumb here is "The greatest good for the greatest number of people." Immunity to the coronavirus is the greatest good. It will prevent the most illnesses and deaths. The few injuries/deaths it may cause would be unfortunate if they happen, but the illnesses/deaths that would occur without the vaccine are much greater, therefore we must go with using the vaccine instead of going without it.
I blame demoncraps for indemnifying billionaire drug companies from injury or death lawsuits that result from vaccines, but do not indemnify employers from similar suits if an employee gets sick or dies after taking the vaccine at the employer's insistence.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Unless you are like Hank Aaron or a young relative of Mitt Romney's.
You have no idea what the actual disease would have done to those same people as compared with the vaccine. The vaccine has a much higher survivability rate than the disease does, obviously.
 

marke

Well-known member
You have no idea what the actual disease would have done to those same people as compared with the vaccine. The vaccine has a much higher survivability rate than the disease does, obviously.
Of course. The CDC has gone on record admitting that only 6% of those who died labeled covid deaths actually died from covid alone and not from other co-morbidities which may have been the cause most responsible for the deaths. You are claiming that people who got deathly ill or died from the vaccines may have actually had co-morbidities as well? You are probably right.
 

marke

Well-known member
Top