Enyart on C-SPAN today defending Personhood Amendment 48

[Bob Enyart]

Hi folks. Today I had the opportunity to appear on C-SPAN defending Colorado's Personhood Amendment 48. The video with me and Crystal Clinkenbeard of No on 48 and some callers is online at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...0736&ei=rgoBSdqoHpryqAPMq6D2Dw&q=amendment+48

Feel free to call any comments in to BEL M-F at 5 p.m. E.T. at 1-800-8Enyart.

-Bob

 

[drbrumley]

I just finished watching your segment....

Outstanding job you did. Clear, concise, you did us proud. Thank you.

 

[Lighthouse]

Is there a version of this video that is the correct size?

 

[Stripe]

I concur, Doc :thumb: . Halfway through now and the case could not be more clear cut on the side of personhood.

 

[Lighthouse]

What was she talking about in reference to cancer? And she blatantly lied about taxes supporting abortion.

 

[Lighthouse]

It'd be interesting for CO, the first state to make abortion legal, the be the first state to make it illegal.:think:

 

[Lighthouse]

Caller: Women should decide this issue without the input of men.

I can't even begin to fathom the lack of intelligence of that statement.

 

[Lighthouse]

:squint:

She actually brought up the right to property? Talk about obfuscating.:doh:

 

[CRASH]

Watching now. Bob is debating the Bull Dyke and winning!

 

[Stripe]

I think the cancer comment is a reference to treatment that might harm baby as a side-effect.

 

[Nick M]

Caller: Women should decide this issue without the input of men.

I can't even begin to fathom the lack of intelligence of that statement.

Common tactic of demoncrats. It is called redirect. Make it a man-woman issue, rather than murder.

Men are more in support of abortion rights than women.

 

[chatmaggot]

Watched it.

Liked it.

Going to tell people about it.

 

[The Graphite]

Onwardly rockin', Bob! :up::up:

 

[CRASH]

It's back up on C Span now with better quality.

http://www.c-span.org/video_rss.aspx?MediaID=38857

 

[chrysostom]

Has anyone mentioned the fact that the Supreme Court can just rule it unconstitutional?

 

[kmoney]

That caller from Reading that said Bob cared more about taking away people's rights than children.......:doh:

Right, Bob doesn't care about staving kids or children being molested, he just wants to take away women's rights.

 

[Lighthouse]

I think the cancer comment is a reference to treatment that might harm baby as a side-effect.

I know that, but it was a re-direct, obviously.

Chemo would certainly be out of the question, but surgery would not. Especially since the cancer itself could harm the baby. And most likely would.