Search results

Battle Royales usually have time constraints that require a commitment that I cannot make. A One on One perhaps but a full blown Battle Royale is probably not in the cards. Not that he would agree to do either one.

Judge Rightly is more than capable of responding here and I look forward to his own response but I just cannot resist posting a response of my own here... Starting point for what, man? I think his name was Adam. Ever heard of him? Well, like JR said, this is called moving the goal post. Your...

Word's right out of the mouth of the likes of David Koresh, Benny Hinn, and Yahweh Ben Yahweh. If you don't need to proof text then stop doing it. Lon, if you lie to me again, I will simply put you on ignore and you can go tell all your make-believe friends that "give you a hard time" that...

I love it when people claim that I am "wrong on so much" but will not present one single solitary refutation of any argument I have ever presented on any subject on this website over the last twenty years. But, you're not alone, Lon! The most important, most fundamental, difference between...

I'm not so sure that any of them exist. Some might be sensor echo anomolies and "exist" in that sense but most are outright hoaxes.

Has anyone else noticed that in spite of the military claiming to have regular contact with unidentified flying objects and in spite of all the high resolution digital photography tech that exists and in spite of the military's ability to drive a missile up an enemy's left nostril from thousands...

Do you simply reject every aspect of God's use of symbols and types? Do you think it was random or by accident that the Jews were killing the Lamb of God on the very day that they were killing their Passover lambs? I mean how much more liturgical could not only the death but also the burial...

I wonder whether I should hold my breath in wait for someone to present any real evidence that transubstantiation actually happens? No. I think I won't be doing that.

Yes, Mark 16! That's what I get for doing these posts in a rush. There can be no argument on this point. The prohibition against the consumption of blood is clear, as you have just shown. If you think that the bible condones the consumption of human blood (i.e. cannibalism) because of Leviticus...

Excellent point! They take these passages in a woodenly literal manner but you don't see the same people taking John 16 quite a literally and doing things like handling snake and drinking strychnine. Actually, the bible expressly forbids the drinking of blood (Genesis 9:2-4; Leviticus 17:14), a...

Yeah, well that may be taking a bit too far. There are lots of Christians who believe wacky things but who still love God and trust in Christ's shed blood as the payment for their sin and that God raised Him from the dead. In other words, believing this one wacky doctrine does not absolutely...

They go way further than that! They believe that the bread and wine physically become the actual flesh and blood of the glorified Christ! The belief is called transubstantiation and it's superstitious nonsense that the bible does not teach and that does not happen.

You are delusional! Not to mention irrational, or didn't you think I'd notice the little "guilt by association" fallacy you threw into your comment. Do you believe that sky is blue? If so, that's the same view as all atheists. Does that imply you're wrong about the color of the sky? It's just...

I mean, I've seen bold claims before but that is a whopper! WOW!

Why rotate a laser? Why not simply have two lasers, each pointing at their respective satellites and fire the one with the further target .000013342 seconds before the other? Actually, there is a really good reason why you wouldn't do that.... The reason is because it wouldn't matter. Either...

:LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:

That is precisely correct! All such passages that discuss God not changing are in reference to His character.

That's good. The problem is that it flows quite logically from Calvin's premise. That premise being that God is immutable. You quite literally cannot have the one without the other. In other words, if humans have free will then God is not immutable.

I honestly have all the patience is the world for people who do not understand the arguments. I can answer questions from now on so long as they are honest question where understanding is the goal. And I do say "understanding", not "agreement". It is not required (or even expected at this point)...

Not that such confused persons don't love God and aren't saved. Most of them simply don't know any better. They're just so much human cattle being led along by the doctinal ring in their nose.