Search results

Strange post. But this part, no longer wishing to discuss theology. Wow. What possesses someone who was interested in theology, to not be interested in it anymore? And I am on purpose conflating theology with theological discourse. Even if you "study on your own", at some point, you have to...

You may not give a flying rat's backside about any of this, but in the off chance that you do, you should consider familiarizing yourself with Dan Reehil. He had the worst imaginable experience with Roman Catholicism when he was a boy. I might have missed it somewhere, where he actually said...

There are no parts of Jesus. And mothers aren't creators. Mothers are bearers, not creators. So Mary the Blessed Virgin our Lady did not create our Lord—she bore Him. That makes her the mother of God. The Assyrian Orthodox branch of our faith also are Nestorians, but there're not very many...

You have to take that up with Jesus, and the Apostles. A tradition is INHERITED. It's not created by you. You received it. It was transmitted, or bequeathed to you. With blood. O negative. Universal donor. Under both species we receive and consume the body, blood, soul, and divinity of...

Neither Ferris neither Flowers brought up the missing link in terms of properly interpreting the Bread of Life Discourse in John chapter six. It's that John wrote his Gospel account last. This is because John implies he's got knowledge of Peter's martyrdom, which we know from history is about...

And hiddenness is odd, something can be right in front of your nose, but you missed it. That's happened to all of us in some way, I'm sure. The way the Suffering Servant of Isaiah was hidden from all descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, was a unique, societal blindness. Just basically...

1st Corinthians 6:11 just isn't the dunk you think it is. I repeat again. $$ 1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, $$ 1Co 6:10...

Now do Beowulf.

The source is the Apostles in both cases tho.

I'm gonna go ... with Paul on this one. I repeat. $$ 1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, $$ 1Co 6:10 Nor thieves, nor...

Also just the Creed, "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life."

And now throw in the diabolic. The diabolic's been trying to deceive us since the Garden of Eden.

That still sounds like you're saying you have no moral obligations, and I don't think that's what Paul is saying at all. If you commit, in Paul's words, " [fornication], [idolatry], [adultery], [behaving effeminately], [abuse of yourself with mankind], [thievery], [coveting], [drunkenness]...

No I'm not. I said I was begging the question deliberately as an example. Same way your experience is significantly meaningful to you, without the Eucharist and belief in the Real Presence. Transubstantiation means changing substance, and substance means changing essence plus accidents, the...

Then you're in even worse shape. Because you're at the mercy of Bible PRINTERS and publishers. THEY'RE the authorities making the table of contents of YOUR Bible. I get that you don't want to admit that there actually is real power at play here, but the reality is that your only option when...

You might not think you believe anymore—but maybe you still do. Maybe you're just trying to steel man unbelief—maybe you're just an honest seeker of truth, like Thomas Jefferson was (he courageously steel manned atheism itself, he was so committed to knowing the truth). Maybe you're method...

So you have no moral obligations is what you're saying? [In this context I can only imagine that this is what you mean.]

obv you should avoid grave sin. $$ 1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, $$ 1Co 6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards...

And that's exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about, except I'm just taking a step back, zooming out from individual evils to their tenet that the Elect are Unconditionally chosen. There's no way to change that choice. And that is the same as twice two being equal to four, as far as moral...

Not Calvinism with Mary mother of God (which is just not being a Nestorian). Calvinism with tolerating abortionist "doctors" dismembering babies in the womb, because Calvinism doesn't harbor moral obligations, so Calvinism doesn't evaluate babies dismembered in the womb by abortionist "doctors"...