Search results

Yet you won't address the meat of my post. Why is that? Are you not sure how to respond? Do you think it a waste of time to engage in discussion of what the Bible teaches? Or perhaps you're just incapable? Whatever the reason, what I said stands, so far, unrebutted by you or anyone, as of...

Saying it doesn't make it so. PROVE your claims. Don't just assert them.

Because you say so? Because you say so? Actually... The term "dispensation" is a term that comes from the greek word for house rules, and can be found in four verses in the Bible. (1 Corinthians 9:17; Ephesians 1:10, 3:2; Colossians 1:25). It also happens to be the term we get the english...

Where have I denied it? See post #27. Is there something specific you think I should reply to? Are you incapable of responding to Rusha? Nope. I have never been "antiCatholic." I simply have a desire to promote a Biblical worldview.

I was half quoting scripture. Of course you do. Because your political beliefs aren't founded in scripture. But are they evil? Supporting, or even not actively trying to dismantle, evil makes one evil. Tom is one of the people who is actively against abortion. What gauntlet? Talk about...

Truth doesn't always convince people. And people will resist truth especially if it means they advance their careers. They end up not looking like a zealot. When a person is ok with killing children, it proves they have no commitment to anyone but themselves. A republican judge who ignores...

Because you say so? As far as I can tell, you haven't been able to rebut our position other than to whine and complain about how right you are and how wrong we are. Care to support that claim? Correct. Incorrect. Correct, in the one Body of Christ. But the Body of Christ is not all...

Because the other major party is also evil. Don't vote for evil that good may come of it.

Your point being?

The reason is simple. The Republican judges care more about their image than they do in upholding the constitution.

True. But that fact alone doesn't make it correct. It just means that the Bible has been handed down for 2000 years. There's more to the Bible being correct than that fact alone. But not because it was handed down. Again, because you say so? I could make the same claim, but neither of us...

Where have I simply repeated my argument and stated that my position stands? Afaik, I have not. Yet you constantly do so. And then you walk away claiming to be the victor. You should humble yourself, TG.

Because you say so? Sorry, that's not how it works. Defend your position using logic, reason, and evidence. Otherwise your posts amount to so much hot air.

Just because something is "handed down for 2000 years" doesn't necessarily make it correct. Which is why your argument, which is an appeal to tradition which is a fallacy, is an invalid argument.

Repeating you position doesn't magically make it become a valid argument. You used fallacious arguments. I'm calling you out on them.

And what I quoted Paul as saying is in direct contradiction to Jesus saying that works are necessary. So how do you reconcile what Paul said with what Jesus said?

Saying it doesn't make it so.

He'd have a better chance of winning if more people voted for him. How about voting for what is good and right, rather than, "can my buy beat the other guy?" https://kgov.com/simpsons-two-party-system-go-ahead-throw-away-your-vote https://kgov.com/bel/20120508 https://kgov.com/bel/20080728...

So Paul was lying? For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,not of works, lest anyone should boast. - Ephesians 2:8-9 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians2:8-9&version=NKJV that if you confess with your mouth the Lord...

Because you say so? Make the argument.