Search results

Fix your formatting.

Of course not. Willful ignorance, of course. I'm going to go off the testimony of two or three witnesses. There are multiple different clips of different instances of Biden being creepy in that video. Each one of them (the video clips) is a witness.

A mother holding her baby? What's wrong with that? How about stuff like this?

I'm talking about the people who apparently can't control their own bodies so as to prevent it from even looking like even remotely pedophiles.

How about assigning blame to those who have put those children in such a position to begin with?

Are you A) calling me a liar, in that you're saying that I did not quote the Bible? or B) asserting that Psalm 49:7-9, which I quoted, verbatim, is not part of the Bible? or perhaps both A and B? Oh, so I was quoting it? Imagine that... I see no gold in the passage, or the chapter either...

Why can't you just say, "YES, I condemn touching children in inappropriate places, with the exception of changing diapers, treating infections, etc"? Perhaps it's my fault for oversimplifying the question in order to cover the widest range of possibilities with regards to pedophilia. Allow me...

Alternatively: Love is the commitment to the good of someone. "Someone" because that someone could be oneself. Agreed.

https://theweeklyworldview.com/unsurrection/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. Unsurrection Posted on January 24, 2021 Your host joins America’s most attractive audio engineer in a sometimes sober and oft hilarious look at the...

Who? All I did was quote the Bible. I didn't quote anyone else.

Just pointing out that men have, generally speaking, become so emasculated as to not be able to think straight, let alone lead.

Eider, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places? This is a simple yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

Arthur Brain, do you, here and now, condemn touching children in inappropriate places, let alone on camera? This is a simply yes or no question. Anything other than a resounding YES I CONDEMN IT will be a "NO, I do not condemn it."

:vomit: So you're actually defending pedophilia, now? Intentionally touching a young girl's chest in a public setting is inappropriate, at best, and pedophilic at worst. Even worse if it's done in such a way as to try to make it seem accidental or coincidental.

My problem isn't that a woman is leading the group. My problem is that there aren't any men willing/able to take a leadership role.

Maybe you should re-read what exactly it is you just said, and how vile it sounds. It sounds exactly how a pedophile would word it. :vomit:

So then why wasn't it mentioned to literally ANYONE between the seventh day and the day the Law was given to Moses?

Reminds me of: None of them can by any means redeem his brother, Nor give to God a ransom for him—For the redemption of their souls is costly, And it shall cease forever—That he should continue to live eternally, And not see the Pit. - Psalm 49:7-9...

So does John. You might want to read all four again, as all four describe Christ, Matthew: the King, Mark: the Servant, Luke: the Man, John: the Son of God who is God.

Because the picture is from a video. He literally holds his nose in the girls hair for a second or two. And she's not the only one he's done it to. Here is a video: https://thepeoplesledger.com/biden-touching-kids-compilation-looks-like-a-trailer-to-a-horror-movie/