Search results

When you did not negate my question about the creative arts. Read great literature and then see if you say that.

Fictional analysis of the human condition are not lies. I would argue the adventures of Huck Finn and the tragedy of Othello provide more valuable lessons than most Bible verses. That's fine, but why must that preclude all else?

So, the case that rape cannot occur within a marital couple was less stupid? Are you referring to my claim or the faux claim within used to make a point? Just because entropy occurs in a closed system does not that it must in an open system. Just because entropy occurs overall in a closed...

That there is a supernatural realm. Yes.

It's almost like you used up your power to imagine on your religion and have nothing left for the creative arts?

Wow. So you get to believe something without evidence and require precise rigor on the other side. Convenient. Lazy.

Pointing out hypocrisy on the other side is not a fallacy. Either the evidence provided to support the notion is valid or it is not. Of course you people here ignore the evidence, offer no evidence of your own, and offer a bold conclusion. What is that fallacy called?

(y)

If he helped coordinate with the Proud Boys to enter the capitol would that mean anything to you?

Anything short of criminal charges against Trump himself is not acceptable.

Pick your best cherries, make a compelling case, but don't forget to address what you left on the tree.

Why do you put credence in the 2nd law of thermodynamics but not the first? No energy can be created or destroyed. If entropy disproves evolution, then the first law disproves creationism. HINT: both claims are stupid.

How can someone hate something that they don't think exists? Do you hate the Santa Clause? Do you hate Batman?

There is no pretend pipeline at all. Someone just applies evidence and principles to the facts and reason dictates whether the conclusions are sound. It is evaluated on the merits not on the basis of access to an authority.

You established nothing, I am not a secular humanist.

No different that the opinions about morality by a religious person. The pretend pipeline to a deity in-the-know actually hinders thinking because of hubris.

Tweedle Derf: A nonreligious person can derive morals from reasoned consideration of tradition, precedent, and evidence; the application of principles of a Democratic Republic, and logical assessment of internal consistency and predicted outcomes. An opinion that can be objectively evaluated...

Try the Old Grey Mare.

On a wing and a prayer, they redefined it out of existence? Wonder why.

I don't prescribe to utilitarianism; that is just Idol's characterization. I don't concern myself with idol. She is Ninety percent hot air.