Search results

:chuckle:

:chuckle:

:chuckle:

I'm smart enough to know that a straight line is more efficient than a parabolic pattern. :D

:chuckle: Have you checked out the crazy flight patterns that do not make sense on a ball?

Doesn't the azimuthal equidistant map wrap perfectly around the ball?

:chuckle:

:chuckle:

This is ironic, as all of your senses tell you that you are not moving and are on a flat plane. :)

If there is an edge, do you think those in positions of power would ever let you get close enough to see it? :)

I'd love to see the results.

Nevertheless, the same kind of testing can be done on many NASA images to show doctoring. Heck, they even admit that their globes are photoshopped. The continents continually change size and shape.

Thanks.

What do amateurs gain by lying? In contrast, NASA would continue to collect $50 million per DAY.

Please reread it.

This just brings me back to my original question from a few days ago that wasn't really addressed. Two groups (one amateur, one NASA) send an aircraft up the same distance, in the same location. 1. Shows curve 2. Shows a flat plane Both cannot be true. One is lying. I suspect that the...

I can't. Have you heard of the Antarctic Treaty?

If you say so. :chuckle: I've got hundreds of live video feeds miles and miles up...flat.

Respectfully, I agree.

Sometimes a picture speaks a thousand words, FYI (to the Moderators)