Search results

Interesting stuff. It would seem to have a few versus that would force the idea, though I am sure those are interpreted differently by others. Of course I always found it interesting how others would say "This is past but this is future." From a strictly historic perspective, Preterism sounds...

I heard of a theological thought that says all of revelations has already happened, though I do not know what this is called and would like to. I found this interesting because most preachers I hear are like "Well, this is allegorical but this is actual." I find these distinctions interesting on...

God didn't have to chose people to throw into hell, they did that themselves. The part of grace is that God selected anyone to be saved.

It is unverifiable because we don't have anything that we know is 2 million years old without using the dating method since written history is not nearly that old.

I am not sure. It was a very brief mention and seemed to imply that is used both free will and predestination but had no details. I know that isn't much to go on, sorry, but is about all I had. It was implied it had something to do with the Calvanists. It seems that there are many theological...

Do weather patterns change? Of course they do. Just read history - Europe's little ice ages (1458–1552, 1600–1720, and 1840–1880) or much warmer weather in Greenland like 800 years ago. The real question is does man cause this? I think it is pure pride that makes man think he does. I also noted...

I have read that there was an older theological doctrine (at least 100 years I think) that was an alternative to the Free Will and Predestination debate. I am not sure what it entails and have lost my note to know what it was called. I am hoping it is not one of those that try to mash the two...

The current dating technique used can not be verified with anything less than 2 millions years old. Please ignore the fact that this makes the process unverifiable is you want to believe the scientists.