Search results

Obviously. I guess that's the problem. The best of your knowledge ... still isn't very good. Why would I be happy with someone who's pretending they're a Christian, who wants to identify as a Christian, who wants to wear this name and tell me your pronouns, and I'm supposed to think of you...

Because you haven't already skipped out of plenty of my questions to you itt? (Because you certainly have.) What's your pedigree? What church are you with? Are you actually a bishop, do other people think you're a bishop or just you in your own mind?

I can't figure out why he was jumping, but wow.

Are you a bishop or not?

Conveniently not. It sure is easy to promote a lie when part of the story is that all the evidence is gone.

Of course you haven't, because there aren't any, because it didn't happen.

lol. As predicted. lol. As predicted. Remember the Greek word "Lord," from the LXX? And Romans 10:9 & 1st Corinthians 12:3? Jesus in that passage says, "I AM the LORD." That's the context there. He was challenged, and He met the challenge by saying, "I AM GOD." Figures you missed it...

Perhaps to Dartman. Not to you. I already answered. The answer I gave is the answer. If you don't accept it fine, but it's the correct answer.

He predicted He'd raise Himself. "Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." You're just a liar and an idiot----both. Irenaeus Against Heresies Book 3 chapter 3: It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see...

Thanks for the tip; I'll check it out.

Nobody believes that except Dispies. You're on a Dispie forum don't forget.

As predicted, you completely contradict Jesus. John 2:19-21 False dichotomy. I believe both, as I am free to do, because I believe the Apostolic oral teaching of the explicit Trinity, which is your stumbling stone.

Versus "19 Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 20 Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? 21 But he spake of the temple of his body." Dartman: Errrr, you see, metaphor...

And in a sense, nor should we. We are ethically independent, but we are not morally independent. Morality is objective, and justice is defending objective morality. The morals when they inform our laws, are our king. They impose on us obligation, and if we break the moral law, we incur moral...

AMR. I don't think I'm superior to you Clete. What are you talking about? We're just talking. The Son is begotten by the Father and the Father generates the Son. That's the two distinctions between the Two Persons the Father and the Son. The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son.

Among Protestants apparently quite a lot. We absolutely do know the answer to that question, and I said what it is.

I made these subreddits just to remind me whenever I encounter injury, that even if I'm just broken down and can't do any other lifts, because I need to favor all my other parts, so they can heal ... https://www.reddit.com/r/Deadlift_Is_Plenty/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Squat_Is_Plenty/ I'm...

I'm back on creatine. I just thought, "Maybe this will help my sore shoulders" (it doesn't :( ). But I've come across this "HMB" stuff recently, which is currently "all the rage" in the "natty" space. I'm going to start it today, and take some of it with my post-workout protein. It's like...

"Separate" is the wrong word. "Distinct" is the word Catholic bishops use. The Son is distinct from the Father, but they are the same substance (which is an Aristotelian way to categorize terms). The terms "the Father almighty" and "the Lord Jesus Christ" have different attributes or...

You have to be able to resist partisan bias and pursue the truth no matter where it lies. But I'm a Republican. There's only two competitive parties in the US and I am sure as heck no Democrat, and I'm not a loser either.