Search results

Greetings again Lon, Another one of your colourful posts, but I do not detect much substance. As well as Psalm 8:4 and Psalm 80:17 which to me clearly answered your false claim, and which you did not discuss, please also consider John 8:28: Psalm 8:4 (KJV): What is man, that thou art mindful...

Greetings again Lon, Nice to hear from you again. I understand that both of these are speaking primarily about Jesus. Psalm 8:4 (KJV): What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man (S#120 Adam), that thou visitest him? Psalm 80:17 (KJV): Let thy hand be upon the man (S#376 ish)...

Greetings again Right Divider, The one Gospel that Jesus and Paul preached is the same gospel revealed in Eden Genesis 3:15, but if I wanted to discuss this topic I could respond to one of your very many threads on this subject. We differ here. Jesus came in the same flesh to overcome sin and...

Greetings Right Divider, Nevertheless, despite your unusual theology and two gospels, Jesus is the Son of Man, and actually the Son of Adam, a descendant from Adam and partaking of his fallen nature, but especially strengthened by God the Father, by means of his conception and education. Psalm...

Greetings again oatmeal, I believe that the Son of Man, Jesus, was made a little lower than the Angels Hebrews 2:9, Psalm 8:4-5. Kind regards Trevor

Greetings again oatmeal, Adam and Eve were a little lower than the Angels before they sinned Genesis 1:26-27, Psalm 8:5. Yes, but the whole process of dominion is now centred in Jesus and the faithful will receive the inheritance when Jesus returns Matthew 5:5, Genesis 13:14-15, Galatians...

Greetings again oatmeal, I appreciate your response. Firstly, Psalm 8:5 is specifically applied to Jesus, not just "man" in general. Your conclusion concerning "Elohim" is similar to many of the modern translations that give the translation "God". I prefer to accept the KJV translation of...

Greetings Trump Gurl, At least the news concerning America has now quietened as broadcast here in Australia. Trump was very noisy and possibly unpredictable. I do not know how many listen to Sky News Australia. I certainly do not have access to Sky News. We have two main government TV Channels...

Greetings again Lon, After reading your response here I decided to look at your 'sticky' thread and was surprised. After reading the first page, 20 posts, I discovered the thread was not not meant to be a discussion on the Trinity. I did not like the flavour of the thread, and it appears that...

Greetings again oatmeal and Lon, This is one of the popular explanations, but when God wants to be emphatic he says, "I, I...". Perhaps you have not properly considered Psalm 8, and Psalm 8:5 which is a summary and David's commentary on Genesis 1:26-27 where the Elohim of Genesis 1:26-27 is...

Greetings again Lon, I noticed that you did not address what the LXX says: "I am THE BEING" and "The BEING has sent me unto you". If I say "I am ...", this does not represent that I am claiming to be Deity, for example I am an Australian. The LXX is a poor translation of the Hebrew here, and no...

Greetings again Idolater, The Angels spoke and acted on the One God, Yahweh's behalf. They also had some delegated authority and responsibility as is evident on some occasions. In the NT times Zechariah was struck dumb, and we not told whether God comminicated this, or Gabriel acted on his own...

Greetings again Hark and Greetings oatmeal and Idolater, I am the librarian for my meeting and also have a reasonable personal collection. The following is the LXX from my electronic Bible program and the versions on Bible Hub which is slightly different. I assume these are reasonably correct...

Greetings again Lon, Yes, "I Will Be", "He will be" is the meaning of His Name. Alec Motyer from possibly his last writing before his death, his New Translation of the Psalms in 2016, when he explained why he used "Yahweh" throughout he stated: 'God' is what he is; Yahweh is who he is...

Gretings again Lon, The "Who" is Yahweh, the Name of the One God of Israel, "He who will be". God is not a "what", but you seem to be hung up on this, despite your grammarian skills. There are no further aspects from your post that need to be discussed, especially your last comment. Kind...

Greetings again Lon, This is your assessment, but I am happy with my level of understanding on this subject. In my opinion you have not given a viable explanation. These all give "I will be" as their translation and thus disagree with "I AM". The majority are not always correct, for example...

Greetings again Lon. I have both explained what it says and what it means. Some names are associated with the future, such as Abraham. No, not at all. You are pressing the narrow view, in a vague support for a Trinitarian bias overruling the honest, simple interpretation given by Tyndale and...

Greetings again Lon, I appreciate your many words, but I hold onto "I will be" as the correct translation and meaning of God's Name. "He who will be" reveals who He is and what He was going to accomplish in delivering Israel out of Egypt and bring them into the Promised Land Exodus 3:12, 6:1-8...

Greetings again Lon, I disagree with your assessment. Actually it would have been interesting to have been on the committee that overruled Tyndales' translation of "I wilbe" and insisted on the "I AM" of the KJV, and also the committee that possibly rejected AB Davidson's transaltion "I will...

Greetings again Lon, As mentioned in my last post, the following is from AB Davidson, a prominent Hebrew scholar. In my first post I mentioned that the margin of the Revised Version has "I will be" for Exodus 3:14, and one of the supporters of this rendition could have been AB Davidson as he...