Search results

It's not just English. It's all high-context languages, and it's about their inherent passive structural functionality to pattern the heart and mind. Once that's exposed and dealt with over a period of time, the English language is fine. But only amongst those who have identified and...

I've read far too much of the Urantia Papers already. It's revisionist drivel. And you have no means of establishing any valid apologetics. Reading content is irrelevant. The literature must be qualified for validity apart from its content. That's your high-context sub-cognitive programming...

You must have mistaken me for someone else or misunderstood. I've read the first 12 Papers, and have skimmed portions of the rest to varying degrees. I've also read a great bulk of all the many writings that freelight posts as links (but long before he posted them). You're just accustomed to...

You guys seem to think that you're exempt from any standard form of actual apologetics and hermeneutics, yet you insist on holding others to those things.

A donkey never exhibited logos. Fail. Unicorns are singular-horned animals, similar to oxen or a species of oxen. Fail. Child rape accusations are bogus like much else. Fail. And any lack of veracity of scripture would STILL leave the UB as merely a fictional novel series. It can't even...

Wow. Such precision and accuracy. Unrevised history gives us those same probabilities.

Yes, you must move along lest you have to provide anything of substance. Run. You couldn't even converse when I broached the intricate topic of all forms of Mysticism and Esotericism throughout history.

There's your perpetual script-flip. This isn't a stalemate. Try again yourself, Mr. Herman. "I know you are, so what am I." ad infinitum. Meet the demands for veracity for ANYTHING you've ever said or read beyond mere opinion and bare assertion. Go ahead. It'll do a body good.

Always looking for some vague authentication for the UB revisionism since there isn't any valid means of examining it for veracity by textual criticism. Keep posting National Enquirer frauds and hoaxes. It's already lent the appropriate air of credibility. None.

Always the inequities and double standards of script-flipping, insisting that "all you've contributed stands". You've become the junior-jedi master of evasion to hide behind the fact that you have no foundation whatsoever for anything except bare assertion of opinion. You set yourself and your...

I'm truly interested in a more autobiographical expose of your adult life, reaching back to whatever point. Though I see the result of where you've ended up in your ideology (or whatever neutral term is descriptive), I've just been somewhat curious about the transition over time and the...

You need a green suit with question marks all over it, and an happy-sinister incessant laugh. The "riddle me this" statements are a remnant of your former life. This ain't the Tao, though nobody can really say what the Tao is, which is my point. The only thing worse might be Haiku. Please...

That's just all too cryptically non-Christian, Dungeon Master. No offense, but it's just the lingering affects from your past; which I hope is truly purged from your heart.

Yes, you have and do. You aren't even aware of how and when. That's the zeal of a novice. As is opposing such, then. As am I, which I have done. It's his double standards and other passive-aggressive inequities that draw appropriate ire. I don't camp here. I don't taunt with one-liners...

Wow. Maybe YOU could engage in textual criticism for your alleged "holy writings" instead of bare assertion and recitation. Nope. Won't happen. It can't. You must just binge and purge, binge and purge. Spiritual bulimia nervosa. You don't even know the difference between soul and spirit...

That's hilarious. You just have no idea. And what is all this gibberish you've transplanted into the actual Christian faith? It makes me sad. Cuz you don't seem like such a bad guy. Freelight is a pawn with an insidious agenda, even if HE doesn't know it. But you... I can't help but...

No.

How ironic that you make that false accusation. My prosopon (face, personal presence and appearance) is that of Jesus Christ, whom I have put on. My hypostasis (substance) is engrafted into God's by faith, which is the hypostasis that came from hearing the hypostasis that is God's Rhema. God...

It would help if you'd exit the basement role-playing game to converse.:think::alien:

Well... Then it would help you immensely if you actually knew what agape/agapao (love) IS. Then you could recognize it when it isn't just all fluffy and cuddly like the false conceptual definition that you've settled for from Humanism and Esotericism.